Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 148 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Noonan v. Noonan CA2018-02-018The trial court did not err by finding appellant in contempt for failing to pay current child support, child support arrearages, and spousal support to his ex-wife as ordered by the trial court where appellant had not paid his support obligations prior to when the motion for contempt was filed, thus amassing a significant amount of support arrearages.S. PowellWarren 6/25/2018 6/25/2018 2018-Ohio-2435
In re Estate of Hudson CA2018-01-002, CA2018-01-003The probate court's failure to provide appellants notice of the appointment of fiduciaries was harmless error where appellants are minors and cannot administer the estates and where appellants raised no arguments that the appointed fiduciaries were incompetent to administer the estates. Probate court's denial of motion to remove administrator of estate is a final appealable order since it determines the action with respect to a provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in favor of the moving party since no meaningful or effective remedy could be granted on an appeal following final resolution of the estate.PiperPreble 6/25/2018 6/25/2018 2018-Ohio-2436
Payson v. Hennessey CA2017-03-030, CA2017-03-036In divorce proceeding, Mother appeals decision designating Father residential parent and court order that the parents pay guardian ad litem fees. Father appeals the court's order with respect to the division of marital property. The court did not abuse its discretion in designating Father residential parent where the evidence indicated that Father was more capable of providing for the children's educational and social needs. The court did not abuse its discretion in ordering supplemental fees paid to guardian where the parties did not object to scope of work undertaken by the guardian ad litem. Providing Father with two months to sell real estate or pay Mother in marital property division order was not an abuse of discretion.HendricksonWarren 6/25/2018 6/25/2018 2018-Ohio-2437
State v. Schleiger CA2009-09-026The trial court did not err by permitting the state to introduce evidence of appellant's three prior offense of violence convictions to raise the charge of carrying a concealed weapon to a fourth-degree felony where appellant did not stipulate to any of the three offenses, which required the state to offer evidence to meet its burden of proof that appellant had previously been convicted of an offense of violence. PowellPreble 6/18/2018 6/18/2018 2018-Ohio-2359
Holbrook v. Holbrook CA2017-05-055Mother's due process rights were not violated when the trial court awarded custody of the parties' children to the father in the divorce decree rather than shared parenting as initially set forth in the trial court's prior decision. PowellWarren 6/18/2018 6/18/2018 2018-Ohio-2360
State v. Scott CA2017-10-152The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to correct his allegedly void sentence claiming the trial court erred by failing to make the required statutory findings before imposing a consecutive sentence where appellant's sentence was not void and therefore barred by the doctrine of res judicata. PowellWarren 6/18/2018 6/18/2018 2018-Ohio-2361
State v. Rippey CA2017-12-186Anders no error.Per CuriamButler 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2258
Bavis v. Deimling CA2017-05-024, CA2017-06-026Trial court did not err by finding that an easement had terminated where the undisputed evidence showed that the former private roadway was no longer in existence, there was a new paved roadway, and there were various homes, curbs, and a cul-de-sac where the former private road existed.RinglandClermont 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2259
In re D.M. CA2017-12-017, CA2017-12-018Juvenile court did not err in granting permanent custody to children services agency where decision was supported by clear and convincing evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence.RinglandPreble 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2260
State v. Laghaoui CA2017-06-098The trial court did not err by finding appellant competent to stand trial where appellant failed to meet his burden of proof establishing his incompetence by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial court also did not err by instructing the jury on intoxication where appellant's intoxication was raised as part of his not guilty by reason of insanity defense, nor did the trial court err by excluding testimony from appellant's intended expert witness where the proffered testimony was an unreliable, untested assumption that was inadmissible pursuant to Evid.R. 702.S. PowellWarren 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2261