|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Plummer
| CA2017-06-080 | Defendant's convictions for gross sexual imposition were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Ringland | Warren |
4/16/2018
|
4/16/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1455 |
|
Grover v. Dourson
| CA2017-09-009 | Appeal dismissed where appellate court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the trial court's decision ordering appellant to pay interim attorney fees to counsel for appellee in a divorce action as the order appealed from was not a final appealable order. | S. Powell | Preble |
4/16/2018
|
4/16/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1456 |
|
State v. Hornsby
| CA2017-09-047 | Defendant was properly convicted and sentenced separately for both a 2016 domestic violence offense and a 2017 felonious assault offense, even if the 2016 domestic violence offense was presumed to be included in the prior acts of violence supporting the felonious assault conviction, because the offenses were of dissimilar import as the physical harm suffered by the victim from the 2016 domestic violence offense was different in nature from the psychological injury resulting from the numerous acts of violence comprising the 2017 felonious assault offense. Defendant's aggregate 10-year prison term for domestic violence and felonious assault is neither excessive nor disproportionate to his behavior. | M. Powell | Clermont |
4/16/2018
|
4/16/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1457 |
|
State v. Lewis
| CA2017-12-179, CA2017-12-180, CA2017-12-181 | The trial court is presumed to have denied appellant's motion requesting the trial court stop his transfer from the local county jail to prison where the trial court did not specifically rule on the motion. Regardless, even if the trial court had ruled on the motion, nothing in the record indicates the trial court would have erred had it specifically rendered such a decision. In addition, the trial court's decision to order consecutive sentences for violating his community control sanctions by pleading guilty to another felony offense is presumed proper where appellant failed to provide the necessary trial transcripts for appellate review. | S. Powell | Butler |
4/16/2018
|
4/16/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1458 |
|
State v. Brightman
| CA2017-11-158 | Appellant's sentence was proper where the trial court sentenced appellant within the statutory range, considered all statutory factors, and imposed postrelease control. The trial court properly issued a certificate of judgment where appellant owed restitution of $2,200 to the victim, the victim requested the restitution, and the clerk of courts issued the certificate on order of the trial court. | Piper | Butler |
4/16/2018
|
4/16/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1459 |
|
State v. Eury
| CA2017-08-125 | Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law where the trial court considered the relevant statutory factors, made the requisite findings, and sentenced appellant within the permissible ranges. The sentence was also supported by the record where appellant's sexual abuse went on for eight years and impacted the victims in several negative ways. | Piper | Butler |
4/16/2018
|
4/16/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1460 |
|
State v. Marfel Motors, Inc.
| CA2017-06-089 | Appellant's misdemeanor conviction for operating an auto sales business without being issued a certificate of zoning compliance from the city of Hamilton was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where a planning and zoning specialist employed by the city testified that he had reviewed the city's paper files and electronic records and no certificate had been issued to appellant. | Hendrickson | Butler |
4/16/2018
|
4/16/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1461 |
|
State v. Buell
| CA2017-07-102 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a new trial where the evidence appellant claimed was newly discovered was available to appellant before her trial started. | Piper | Warren |
4/9/2018
|
4/9/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1350 |
|
Nichols v. Nichols
| CA2017-08-014 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in deviating from the guidelines for child support where appellee had custody of two of the three children, paid all out-of-pocket medical expenses, and the parties previously agreed during their divorce negotiations that neither party would pay child support. | Piper | Madison |
4/9/2018
|
4/9/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1351 |
|
State v. Reeder
| CA2016-05-011 | Anders no error. | Per Curiam | Clinton |
4/9/2018
|
4/9/2018
| 2018-Ohio-1352 |
|