Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 148 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Cunningham CA2016-04-083Father's conviction for murder and endangering children supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence where father admitted to shaking the infant and the infant's traumatic brain injuries were consistent with a non-accidental traumatic event. Father could not demonstrate plain error as to a claimed erroneous jury instruction where father could not clearly demonstrate a different outcome at trial. The trial court erred in failing to impose court costs in open court.S. PowellButler 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4363
State v. Kinner CA2016-06-105Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law, and was supported by the record where the trial court sentenced appellant within the statutory range for a first-degree felony after considering the proper sentencing factors and considering the facts of the crime.PiperButler 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4364
State v. Dunbar CA2016-08-165The trial court did not err by finding appellant guilty of assault. The trial court, as trier of fact, was in the best position to weigh the credibility of the witnesses.RinglandButler 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4365
Espy v. Interstate Food Serv., L.L.C. CA2016-10-199Trial court erred by granting summary judgment where there were disputed issues of fact as to whether a company negligently entrusted its vehicle to an unlicensed individual and whether the individual was an independent contractor or an employee.RinglandButler 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4366
State v. Wohl CA2016-11-218The trial court did not err, let alone commit plain error, by failing to merge appellant's three rape convictions with that of his conviction for burglary where the burglary was already completed once appellant forced his way into the victim's home and raped her digitally, vaginally, and anally.S. PowellButler 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4367
State v. Fridley CA2016-05-030Trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress evidence tending to prove appellant's intoxication, including the results of a Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test and two blood draws. In addition, appellant was not entitled to the suppress of incriminating statements made to police prior to arrest where appellant was not subject to custodial interrogation, which would have triggered the need for Miranda warnings.RinglandClermont 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4368
Total Quality Logistics, L.L.C. v. Red Chamber Co. CA2016-09-062Company was not denied a meaningful opportunity to respond before grant of summary judgment where it had notice of possible federal preemption of its state law claims.S. PowellClermont 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4369
Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care CA2016-10-014Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Stonecreek Dental Care where jury did not consider damages allocable to the company.HendricksonFayette 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4370
State v. Collins CA2016-09-009The trial court did not commit a clear error by denying appellant's motion for a Franks hearing where, even if the allegedly false statement was excluded from the warrant affidavit, the affidavit provided the trial judge with more than enough evidence to establish probable cause justifying the issuance of the search warrant of the entire property, up to and including appellant's vehicle. The trial court also did not err by denying appellant's motion to compel the state to reinstate its prior plea deal where appellant could not show that his trial counsel performed deficiently during plea negotiations. S. PowellPreble 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4371
State v. Cavanaugh CA2016-11-215Anders no error.Per CuriamButler 6/12/2017 6/12/2017 2017-Ohio-4224