|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
Noonan v. Noonan
| CA2018-02-018 | The trial court did not err by finding appellant in contempt for failing to pay current child support, child support arrearages, and spousal support to his ex-wife as ordered by the trial court where appellant had not paid his support obligations prior to when the motion for contempt was filed, thus amassing a significant amount of support arrearages. | S. Powell | Warren |
6/25/2018
|
6/25/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2435 |
|
In re Estate of Hudson
| CA2018-01-002, CA2018-01-003 | The probate court's failure to provide appellants notice of the appointment of fiduciaries was harmless error where appellants are minors and cannot administer the estates and where appellants raised no arguments that the appointed fiduciaries were incompetent to administer the estates. Probate court's denial of motion to remove administrator of estate is a final appealable order since it determines the action with respect to a provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in favor of the moving party since no meaningful or effective remedy could be granted on an appeal following final resolution of the estate. | Piper | Preble |
6/25/2018
|
6/25/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2436 |
|
Payson v. Hennessey
| CA2017-03-030, CA2017-03-036 | In divorce proceeding, Mother appeals decision designating Father residential parent and court order that the parents pay guardian ad litem fees. Father appeals the court's order with respect to the division of marital property. The court did not abuse its discretion in designating Father residential parent where the evidence indicated that Father was more capable of providing for the children's educational and social needs. The court did not abuse its discretion in ordering supplemental fees paid to guardian where the parties did not object to scope of work undertaken by the guardian ad litem. Providing Father with two months to sell real estate or pay Mother in marital property division order was not an abuse of discretion. | Hendrickson | Warren |
6/25/2018
|
6/25/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2437 |
|
State v. Schleiger
| CA2009-09-026 | The trial court did not err by permitting the state to introduce evidence of appellant's three prior offense of violence convictions to raise the charge of carrying a concealed weapon to a fourth-degree felony where appellant did not stipulate to any of the three offenses, which required the state to offer evidence to meet its burden of proof that appellant had previously been convicted of an offense of violence. | Powell | Preble |
6/18/2018
|
6/18/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2359 |
|
Holbrook v. Holbrook
| CA2017-05-055 | Mother's due process rights were not violated when the trial court awarded custody of the parties' children to the father in the divorce decree rather than shared parenting as initially set forth in the trial court's prior decision. | Powell | Warren |
6/18/2018
|
6/18/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2360 |
|
State v. Scott
| CA2017-10-152 | The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to correct his allegedly void sentence claiming the trial court erred by failing to make the required statutory findings before imposing a consecutive sentence where appellant's sentence was not void and therefore barred by the doctrine of res judicata. | Powell | Warren |
6/18/2018
|
6/18/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2361 |
|
State v. Rippey
| CA2017-12-186 | Anders no error. | Per Curiam | Butler |
6/11/2018
|
6/11/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2258 |
|
Bavis v. Deimling
| CA2017-05-024, CA2017-06-026 | Trial court did not err by finding that an easement had terminated where the undisputed evidence showed that the former private roadway was no longer in existence, there was a new paved roadway, and there were various homes, curbs, and a cul-de-sac where the former private road existed. | Ringland | Clermont |
6/11/2018
|
6/11/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2259 |
|
In re D.M.
| CA2017-12-017, CA2017-12-018 | Juvenile court did not err in granting permanent custody to children services agency where decision was supported by clear and convincing evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Ringland | Preble |
6/11/2018
|
6/11/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2260 |
|
State v. Laghaoui
| CA2017-06-098 | The trial court did not err by finding appellant competent to stand trial where appellant failed to meet his burden of proof establishing his incompetence by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial court also did not err by instructing the jury on intoxication where appellant's intoxication was raised as part of his not guilty by reason of insanity defense, nor did the trial court err by excluding testimony from appellant's intended expert witness where the proffered testimony was an unreliable, untested assumption that was inadmissible pursuant to Evid.R. 702. | S. Powell | Warren |
6/11/2018
|
6/11/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2261 |
|