Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 123 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re C.L.H. CA2016-11-217The juvenile court's decision granting legal custody of a child to the child's paternal cousin was in the child's best interest and otherwise not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the child had developed a strong bond with her cousin who had provided the child with a safe and stable home since the child was placed in her temporary custody.S. PowellButler 5/22/2017 5/22/2017 2017-Ohio-2925
State v. Potee CA2016-06-045Trial court did not err in overruling defendant's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal where the state properly established venue in multiple jurisdictions.RinglandClermont 5/22/2017 5/22/2017 2017-Ohio-2926
State v. Van Tielen CA2016-10-020The trial court erred by denying a motion to return property based solely on the basis of res judicata. The trial court did not have jurisdiction to consider the relevant request while appellant's conviction was on appeal and there were no previous arguments for forfeiture. RinglandBrown 5/15/2017 5/15/2017 2017-Ohio-2799
State v. Green CA2016-09-187Trial court's denial of successive Crim.R. 32.1 post-sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea is upheld on the basis of res judicata where appellant could have raised the issue relating to the trial court's failure to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) on direct appeal or in his previous Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw his plea, but did not.M. PowellButler 5/15/2017 5/15/2017 2017-Ohio-2800
State v. Miller CA2016-08-057The trial court's decision to deny appellant's most recent pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea was proper where appellant's claims alleging his guilty plea was invalid and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel were either not supported by the record or barred by the doctrine of res judicata.S. PowellClermont 5/15/2017 5/15/2017 2017-Ohio-2801
State v. Workman CA2016-10-065, CA2016-10-066The trial court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress where officers executed a valid search warrant, and did not exceed the scope of that warrant. Also, the offenses were not allied where appellant committed the crimes with a separate animus and separate conduct, and where the crimes had different victims.PiperClermont 5/15/2017 5/15/2017 2017-Ohio-2802
Lindholm v. Lindholm CA2016-08-073Trial court erred by failing to include purge provision in civil contempt order.RinglandWarren 5/15/2017 5/15/2017 2017-Ohio-2807
State v. Goodwin CA2016-05-099Appellant's conviction for cruelty to animals was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state demonstrated that in a week's time, appellant only fed the dog and let it outside its cage two or three times, never took the dog outside the apartment, and did not seek treatment for the dog despite it being thin and having open sores on its hind end and hip. HendricksonButler 5/8/2017 5/8/2017 2017-Ohio-2712
Clarkwestern Dietrich Bldg. Sys., L.L.C. v. Certified Steel Stud Assn., Inc. CA2016-06-113The trial court properly granted summary judgment by finding that appellant's statements were factual in nature, rather than opinion, and also properly denied appellant's motion for JNOV where the trial court did not err in limiting expert testimony from the parties.PiperButler 5/8/2017 5/8/2017 2017-Ohio-2713
Lake v. Love CA2016-06-116Trial court did not err in denying defendant's counterclaim for conversion where the record demonstrated he failed to use ordinary and reasonable effort to avoid or lessen his damages. Defendant delayed more than 17 months in retrieving his items from the plaintiff's property, this delay was a result of his own actions and not those of the plaintiff, and he had not taken any action to prevent damage to his belongings after learning they had been removed from the pole barn and placed outside.HendricksonButler 5/8/2017 5/8/2017 2017-Ohio-2714