Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 80 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Clarkwestern Dietrich Bldg. Sys. L.L.C. v. Certified Steel Stud Assn., Inc. CA2016-05-098Trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of private trade association under the Ohio Valentine Act where the manufacturer was not prevented, through anticompetitive activity, from marketing and selling its product. Absent an enforcement device that restrained trade and prevented the manufacturer from selling or customers from buying its products, there is no antitrust violation.RinglandButler 3/27/2017 3/27/2017 2017-Ohio-1091
State v. Erdman CA2016-07-126The municipal court properly accepted appellant's no contest plea because he had been informed of the effect of his plea. Appellant also waived the reading of facts at the plea hearing, and is thus foreclosed from arguing that the municipal court failed to consider relevant facts and circumstances before finding him guilty.PiperButler 3/27/2017 3/27/2017 2017-Ohio-1092
In re R.L.D. CA2016-07-132, CA2016-07-133A juvenile court's later decision overruling a party's untimely objections to a magistrate's decision is void since the juvenile court's jurisdiction terminated when it entered its original judgment entry affirming and adopting the magistrate's decision and no timely objections were filed. Therefore, because appellant did not file a timely notice of appeal, appellate court lacked the requisite jurisdiction to consider appellant's appeal.S. PowellButler 3/27/2017 3/27/2017 2017-Ohio-1093
State v. Whipple CA2016-06-036The trial court erred by granting appellee's motion to suppress evidence where the evidence was recovered during a lawful search incident to arrest.RinglandClermont 3/27/2017 3/27/2017 2017-Ohio-1094
State v. Monnin CA2016-07-058Appellant's conviction for failure to comply with the order or signal of a police officer was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state established that appellant failed to stop his vehicle after receiving a visible and audible signal to stop from a police officer, he traveled at a rate of speed in excess of 111 m.p.h., and his actions caused a substantial risk of serious physical harm to people and property.HendricksonWarren 3/27/2017 3/27/2017 2017-Ohio-1095
State v. Fletcher CA2016-08-016Trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress where the officer's action of pushing open the door to visually scan for firearms to ensure his and his fellow officer's safety was reasonable and the minimal intrusion was limited to the exigency that existed. Appellant's convictions for aggravated trafficking in methamphetamine, aggravated possession of methamphetamine, and possession of the drug Clonazepam were supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court committed plain error when it failed to merge appellant's convictions for aggravated trafficking in methamphetamine and aggravated possession of methamphetamine as allied offenses as the offenses are similar in import, were committed with the same animus, and were not committed separately.HendricksonBrown 3/20/2017 3/20/2017 2017-Ohio-1006
State v. Kirkpatrick CA2016-11-223Anders no error.Per CuriamButler 3/20/2017 3/20/2017 2017-Ohio-1007
State v. Honaker CA2016-06-046Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel where his guilty pleas were made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, and where the trial court had proper subject matter jurisdiction over the case.PiperClermont 3/20/2017 3/20/2017 2017-Ohio-1008
Ganaway v. Ganaway CA2016-05-039Notwithstanding its caption as a magistrate's decision, magistrate's discovery ruling was a magistrate's order under Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i); by failing to file a motion to set aside the magistrate's order as required under Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(b), father waived a challenge to the order on appeal. Father's appeal of trial court's contempt decision was moot where father complied with the trial court's purge conditions, thereby purging himself of the civil contempt charge.M. PowellWarren 3/20/2017 3/20/2017 2017-Ohio-1009
Cox v. Cox CA2016-05-040The trial court properly determined that appellant's motion to modify spousal support should be denied because no change had occurred that was not considered at the time the divorce decree went into effect.PiperWarren 3/20/2017 3/20/2017 2017-Ohio-1010
12345678