|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
Zellner v. Prestige Gardens Rehab. & Nursing Ctr.
| 14-18-14 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by staying the proceedings pending arbitration. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff-appellant's motion to compel. The trial court did not err by denying plaintiff-appellant's motion for an extension of time to respond to defendants-appellees' motion to stay. | Preston | Union |
2/19/2019
|
2/19/2019
| 2019-Ohio-595 |
|
State v. Owens
| 1-18-48; 1-18-49 | Defendant-appellant's driving-under-OVI-suspension convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Preston | Allen |
2/11/2019
|
2/11/2019
| 2019-Ohio-440 |
|
In re H.C.
| 17-18-14 | Juvenile did not rebut inference that stop sign was compliant with Ohio law with any actual evidence. | Shaw | Shelby |
2/11/2019
|
2/11/2019
| 2019-Ohio-441 |
|
Johnson v. Stone
| 1-18-40 | Trial court's determination that appellants did not establish that a novation occurred in this case was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Shaw | Allen |
2/4/2019
|
2/4/2019
| 2019-Ohio-318 |
|
HCF of Findlay, Inc. v. Bishop
| 5-18-20 | The trial court correctly determined that the defendant-appellee did not breach her contract with the plaintiff-appellant. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Hancock |
2/4/2019
|
2/4/2019
| 2019-Ohio-319 |
|
State v. Linebaugh
| 8-18-32 | The trial court did not err by sentencing the defendant-appellant to 60 months in prison because the sentence is within the permissible statutory range, the trial court properly considered the criteria found in R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12, the record clearly and convincingly supports the trial court’s findings under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12, and his sentence is not otherwise contrary to law. | Zimmerman | Logan |
2/4/2019
|
2/4/2019
| 2019-Ohio-320 |
|
State v. Jackson
| 13-18-18 | Defendant-appellant's domestic-violence and disrupting-public-services convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. Defendant-appellant's domestic-violence and disrupting-public-services convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Preston | Seneca |
1/22/2019
|
1/22/2019
| 2019-Ohio-170 |
|
Bey v. Rasawehr
| 10-18-02, 10-18-03 | The trial court did not err in finding that the evidence supported the petitioners’ request for a civil stalking protection order. Trial court’s specific condition on the orders of protection relating to the respondent’s internet postings about petitioners was not unconstitutional. | Shaw | Mercer |
1/14/2019
|
1/14/2019
| 2019-Ohio-57 |
|
State v. Carpenter
| 13-18-16 | Defendant-appellant’s possession-of heroin, -cocaine, and –criminal tools; trafficking-in-drugs; corrupting-another-with-drugs convictions are based on sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not commit plain error by denying defendant-appellant’s motion for severance. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. | Zimmerman | Seneca |
1/14/2019
|
1/14/2019
| 2019-Ohio-58 |
|
State v. McBeth
| 13-18-19 | The trial court has the discretion to permit the prosecution to ask leading questions of a State's witness on direct examination in order to allow the State to develop the witness's testimony. In this case, the use of leading questions on direct examination did not present a Confrontation Clause issue. | Willamowski | Seneca |
1/14/2019
|
1/14/2019
| 2019-Ohio-59 |
|