|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Dellifield
| 6-18-06 | Defendant did not demonstrate that statutes were unconstitutional. Venue was sufficiently established. Convictions for Attempted Illegal Use of a Minor in Nudity Oriented Material affirmed. | Shaw | Hardin |
12/10/2018
|
12/10/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4919 |
|
State v. Young
| 8-18-11 | The trial court did not err in accepting Appellant’s guilty plea for two felony offenses and sentencing her to consecutive prison terms. | Shaw | Logan |
12/10/2018
|
12/10/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4920 |
|
State v. Watkins
| 8-18-21 | Trial court's sentence was supported by the record. | Shaw | Logan |
12/10/2018
|
12/10/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4921 |
|
State v. Lawson
| 13-18-20 | Plea vacated where pressure placed on defendant to proceed in the absence of a sufficient waiver of counsel. | Shaw | Seneca |
12/10/2018
|
12/10/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4922 |
|
State v. Buckner
| 15-18-07 | This court's review of defendant-appellant's sentence is barred under R.C. 2953.08(D)(1). Appeal dismissed. | Preston | Van Wert |
12/10/2018
|
12/10/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4923 |
|
Canada v. Blakenship
| 9-18-16 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting Appellee’s motion to modify and effectively terminate the parties prior shared parenting agreement. | Shaw | Marion |
12/3/2018
|
12/3/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4781 |
|
State v. Watkins
| 12-18-08 | Trial counsel's performance at trial does not meet the criteria set forth in State v. Cronic. Further, Appellant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Lastly, the State presented sufficient evidence to convict Appellant and the jury verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Putnam |
11/26/2018
|
11/26/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4722 |
|
Snyder v. Affordable Constr. Co
| 5-18-07 | The trial court did not err in denying Appellant's request for a continuance. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Hancock |
11/26/2018
|
11/26/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4723 |
|
State v. Cole
| 8-18-26 | Defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not contrary to law because the trial court made the appropriate R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings at the sentencing hearing. Although the trial court failed to properly incorporate all of its consecutive sentencing findings into its judgment entry of sentence, the trial court may correct this error via a nunc pro tunc order. | Preston | Logan |
11/19/2018
|
11/19/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4646 |
|
State v. Hill
| 7-18-24 | The defendant-appellant's rights under R.C. 2929.19 and Crim.R. 32 were not violated. Further, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant-appellant's community-control sanctions. Lastly, the defendant-appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Henry |
11/19/2018
|
11/19/2018
| 2018-Ohio-4647 |
|