|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Brown
| 1-19-61 | The trial court did not commit plain error by allowing the admission of the victim's out-of-court statements as substantive evidence. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion. Defendant-appellant's conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court erred by not calculating the number of days of jail-time credit, if any, to which defendant-appellant might be entitled. | Preston | Allen |
7/6/2020
|
7/6/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3614 |
|
State v. Williams
| 2-19-04 | Sufficient evidence was presented to support murder conviction and the conviction was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel. | Shaw | Auglaize |
7/6/2020
|
7/6/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3616 |
|
State v. Cartlidge
| 13-19-44 | At the time that an accused is imprisoned in a correctional institution within the State of Ohio, R.C. 2941.401 applies to the exclusion of R.C. 2945.71(D). | Willamowski | Seneca |
7/6/2020
|
7/6/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3615 |
|
State v. Sanders
| 2-19-13 | Appellant's sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law; appellant cannot demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel at the sentencing hearing. | Shaw | Auglaize |
6/29/2020
|
6/29/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3506 |
|
State v. Mason
| 1-19-74 | The defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are supported by the record. | Zimmerman | Allen |
6/29/2020
|
6/29/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3505 |
|
State v. Miller
| 8-19-28 | In order to establish a violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a), the State must prove that the defendant operated a vehicle in the State while under the influence of alcohol, a drug of abuse, or a combination of them. | Willamowski | Logan |
6/29/2020
|
6/29/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3504 |
|
In re J.S.
| 5-19-22, 5-19-23, 5-19-24 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by entering a disposition which committed juvenile-appellant to the care and custody of the Ohio Department of Youth Services. | Preston | Hancock |
6/22/2020
|
6/22/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3413 |
|
Nance v. Lima Auto Mall, Inc.
| 1-19-54 | To establish a wrongful termination in violation of public policy claim, the plaintiff must establish the (1) clarity (2) jeopardy (3) causation (4) and overriding justification elements of the requisite legal test. A plaintiff may establish a gender discrimination claim by demonstrating he or she was (1) a member of a protected class; (2) was qualified for the job; (3) suffered an adverse employment action; and (4) was treated differently than a similarly situated non minority coworker who had engaged in the same or similar conduct. To establish a perceived disability discrimination claim, the plaintiff need not demonstrate that he or she has a qualifying disability under Ohio's discrimination law but must demonstrate that he or she was perceived by the employer as being disabled. | Willamowski | Allen |
6/22/2020
|
6/22/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3419 |
|
State v. Smith
| 17-19-19 | The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is not clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentence is unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law. | Preston | Shelby |
6/22/2020
|
6/22/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3414 |
|
Ward v. Ward
| 9-19-24 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by determining that plaintiff-appellee's shares of stock in a closely-held corporation were separate property. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding a vehicle and its associated debt to defendant-appellant. | Preston | Marion |
6/22/2020
|
6/22/2020
| 2020-Ohio-3415 |
|