|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Guzman
| 1-19-11 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by issuing a judgment of forfeiture against surety. | Zimmerman | Allen |
2/18/2020
|
2/18/2020
| 2020-Ohio-539 |
|
In re C.J.
| 5-19-15, 5-19-16, 5-19-17 & 5-19-18 | The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Zimmerman | Hancock |
2/18/2020
|
2/18/2020
| 2020-Ohio-538 |
|
State v. Pinks
| 6-19-08 | The record supports the trial court’s finding that Appellant violated his community control sanctions. | Shaw | Hardin |
2/18/2020
|
2/18/2020
| 2020-Ohio-537 |
|
Fahncke v. Fahncke
| 2-19-05 | The trial court erred by granting summary judgment to the defendant-appellees. | Zimmerman | Auglaize |
2/10/2020
|
2/10/2020
| 2020-Ohio-433 |
|
State v. Gaddy
| 1-19-35; 1-19-36 | The appellant failed to demonstrated that the trial court committed an abuse of discretion when it overruled his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas. | Shaw | Allen |
2/10/2020
|
2/10/2020
| 2020-Ohio-430 |
|
State v. Potter
| 5-19-14 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by instructing the jury on attempted trespass in a habitation when a person is present or likely to be present. | Preston | Hancock |
2/10/2020
|
2/10/2020
| 2020-Ohio-431 |
|
State v. Cook
| 5-19-26 | Trial court did not err in denying suppression motion where defendant claimed that growing mushrooms and using marijuana was a protected religious act. | Shaw | Hancock |
2/10/2020
|
2/10/2020
| 2020-Ohio-432 |
|
State v. Rasawehr
| 10-19-15 | Defendant-appellant's menacing-by-stalking and telecommunications-harassment convictions are based on sufficient evidence. The trial court's jury instructions and the State's closing argument do not amount to structural error. | Zimmerman | Mercer |
2/10/2020
|
2/10/2020
| 2020-Ohio-429 |
|
State v. Chavez
| 13-19-05; 13-19-06; 13-19-07 | Defendant-appellant’s felonious-assault conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The State did not violate defendant-appellant’s right to remain silent by addressing defendant-appellant’s refusal to speak with law enforcement officers during their investigation. The trial court did not err by providing an incomplete and inaccurate self-defense jury instruction and defendant-appellant’s trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a self-defense jury instruction and verdict form that represent correct statements of law. | Zimmerman | Seneca |
2/10/2020
|
2/10/2020
| 2020-Ohio-426 |
|
State v. Smith
| 13-19-26 | Defendant-appellant's trafficking-in-cocaine, trafficking-in-drugs, and complicity-to-trafficking-in-cocaine convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's motion for a mistrial. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is not clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentence is unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law. | Preston | Seneca |
2/10/2020
|
2/10/2020
| 2020-Ohio-427 |
|