Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 80 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Howton 1-16-35The crimes of rape and kidnapping are not allied offenses of similar import when committed at different times and in different locations.WillamowskiAllen 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4349
Jalm Marion, L.L.C. v. Fair Park Ents., Inc. 9-16-42Trial court's judgment finding that the original repairs were not performed in a workmanlike manner was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court's questioning of the witness did not violate the impartiality standard set forth in Evid.R. 614(B). The calculation of damages was improper when the repairs put the purchaser in a better position than would have existed if the original repairs were done in a workmanlike manner.WillamowskiMarion 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4350
State v. Jones 8-16-18The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the Evid.R. 404(B) evidence.PrestonLogan 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4351
In re L.W. 9-16-55, 9-16-56Trial court did not err in finding that terminating parental rights was in the best interests of the children and granting permanent custody to the Agency.WillamowskiMarion 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4352
State v. Marland 8-16-15The trial court relied on competent and credible evidence in denying defendant's motion to suppress, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of defendant's trial counsel's cross examination.PrestonLogan 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4353
State v. Carter 1-17-09Trial court's denial of post-conviction petition affirmed.ShawAllen 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4354
State. Todd 6-16-11The jury's verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence and the appellant was not prejudiced by the timeframes used in the indictment and bill of particulars. ShawHardin 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4355
State v. Thomas 1-16-36The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence. Defendant-appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel at trial because of his trial counsel's conflict of interest. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's motion to dismiss Count 4 of the indictment.PrestonAllen 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4356
Savidge v. Klaus 2-17-02Trial court's judgment in favor of appellee for repair costs to a tractor was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.ShawAuglaize 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4357
State v. Moore 13-17-07The application of R.C. 2907.03(A)(5) is not unconstitutional as applied to the consensual sexual conduct between a natural parent, whose parental rights were previously terminated, and an adult child.PrestonSeneca 6/19/2017 6/19/2017 2017-Ohio-4358
12345678