Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 18 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Guzman 1-19-11The trial court did not abuse its discretion by issuing a judgment of forfeiture against surety.ZimmermanAllen 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2020-Ohio-539
In re C.J. 5-19-15, 5-19-16, 5-19-17 & 5-19-18The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.ZimmermanHancock 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2020-Ohio-538
State v. Pinks 6-19-08The record supports the trial court’s finding that Appellant violated his community control sanctions.ShawHardin 2/18/2020 2/18/2020 2020-Ohio-537
Fahncke v. Fahncke 2-19-05The trial court erred by granting summary judgment to the defendant-appellees.ZimmermanAuglaize 2/10/2020 2/10/2020 2020-Ohio-433
State v. Gaddy 1-19-35; 1-19-36The appellant failed to demonstrated that the trial court committed an abuse of discretion when it overruled his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas. ShawAllen 2/10/2020 2/10/2020 2020-Ohio-430
State v. Potter 5-19-14The trial court did not abuse its discretion by instructing the jury on attempted trespass in a habitation when a person is present or likely to be present.PrestonHancock 2/10/2020 2/10/2020 2020-Ohio-431
State v. Cook 5-19-26Trial court did not err in denying suppression motion where defendant claimed that growing mushrooms and using marijuana was a protected religious act.ShawHancock 2/10/2020 2/10/2020 2020-Ohio-432
State v. Rasawehr 10-19-15Defendant-appellant's menacing-by-stalking and telecommunications-harassment convictions are based on sufficient evidence. The trial court's jury instructions and the State's closing argument do not amount to structural error.ZimmermanMercer 2/10/2020 2/10/2020 2020-Ohio-429
State v. Chavez 13-19-05; 13-19-06; 13-19-07Defendant-appellant’s felonious-assault conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The State did not violate defendant-appellant’s right to remain silent by addressing defendant-appellant’s refusal to speak with law enforcement officers during their investigation. The trial court did not err by providing an incomplete and inaccurate self-defense jury instruction and defendant-appellant’s trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a self-defense jury instruction and verdict form that represent correct statements of law.ZimmermanSeneca 2/10/2020 2/10/2020 2020-Ohio-426
State v. Smith 13-19-26Defendant-appellant's trafficking-in-cocaine, trafficking-in-drugs, and complicity-to-trafficking-in-cocaine convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's motion for a mistrial. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is not clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentence is unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.PrestonSeneca 2/10/2020 2/10/2020 2020-Ohio-427