Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 101 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Brown 1-19-61The trial court did not commit plain error by allowing the admission of the victim's out-of-court statements as substantive evidence. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion. Defendant-appellant's conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court erred by not calculating the number of days of jail-time credit, if any, to which defendant-appellant might be entitled.PrestonAllen 7/6/2020 7/6/2020 2020-Ohio-3614
State v. Williams 2-19-04Sufficient evidence was presented to support murder conviction and the conviction was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel.ShawAuglaize 7/6/2020 7/6/2020 2020-Ohio-3616
State v. Cartlidge 13-19-44At the time that an accused is imprisoned in a correctional institution within the State of Ohio, R.C. 2941.401 applies to the exclusion of R.C. 2945.71(D).WillamowskiSeneca 7/6/2020 7/6/2020 2020-Ohio-3615
State v. Sanders 2-19-13Appellant's sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law; appellant cannot demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel at the sentencing hearing.ShawAuglaize 6/29/2020 6/29/2020 2020-Ohio-3506
State v. Mason 1-19-74The defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are supported by the record.ZimmermanAllen 6/29/2020 6/29/2020 2020-Ohio-3505
State v. Miller 8-19-28In order to establish a violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a), the State must prove that the defendant operated a vehicle in the State while under the influence of alcohol, a drug of abuse, or a combination of them.WillamowskiLogan 6/29/2020 6/29/2020 2020-Ohio-3504
In re J.S. 5-19-22, 5-19-23, 5-19-24The trial court did not abuse its discretion by entering a disposition which committed juvenile-appellant to the care and custody of the Ohio Department of Youth Services.PrestonHancock 6/22/2020 6/22/2020 2020-Ohio-3413
Nance v. Lima Auto Mall, Inc. 1-19-54To establish a wrongful termination in violation of public policy claim, the plaintiff must establish the (1) clarity (2) jeopardy (3) causation (4) and overriding justification elements of the requisite legal test. A plaintiff may establish a gender discrimination claim by demonstrating he or she was (1) a member of a protected class; (2) was qualified for the job; (3) suffered an adverse employment action; and (4) was treated differently than a similarly situated non minority coworker who had engaged in the same or similar conduct. To establish a perceived disability discrimination claim, the plaintiff need not demonstrate that he or she has a qualifying disability under Ohio's discrimination law but must demonstrate that he or she was perceived by the employer as being disabled.WillamowskiAllen 6/22/2020 6/22/2020 2020-Ohio-3419
State v. Smith 17-19-19The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is not clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentence is unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.PrestonShelby 6/22/2020 6/22/2020 2020-Ohio-3414
Ward v. Ward 9-19-24The trial court did not abuse its discretion by determining that plaintiff-appellee's shares of stock in a closely-held corporation were separate property. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding a vehicle and its associated debt to defendant-appellant.PrestonMarion 6/22/2020 6/22/2020 2020-Ohio-3415