Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 179 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Bragdon v. Carter 17CA3791Civil: testamentary restraints on the alienation of real property; real estate law.HooverScioto 10/18/2017 10/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8257
State v. Stout 16CA24Criminal: Defendant's conviction for violation of Athens City Code 7.04.01(A), Assured Clear Distance Ahead, was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.HooverAthens 10/16/2017 10/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8258
In re J.R.F. 16CA701Probate court-adoption-plain error-trial court did not obviously err by failing to conclude that indigent parent possesses constitutional right to appointed counsel; current state of Ohio law does not plainly hold that denying appointed counsel to indigent parent in adoption proceeding violates equal protection or due process principles; trial court did not obviously err by failing to determine that Mathews v. Eldridge factors balanced in favor of appointing counsel in appellant's case.AbeleVinton 9/29/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8125
In re J.M.P. 16CA702Probate court-adoption-plain error-trial court did not obviously err by failing to conclude that indigent parent possesses constitutional right to appointed counsel; current state of Ohio law does not plainly hold that denying appointed counsel to indigent parent in adoption proceeding violates equal protection or due process principles; trial court did not obviously err by failing to determine that Mathews v. Eldridge factors balanced in favor of appointing counsel in appellant's case.AbeleVinton 9/29/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8126
Mitchell v. Holzer Med. Ctr. 16CA20Motion for judgment on the pleadings-trial court did not err by determining statute of limitations barred appellant's complaint; any error trial court made by overruling procedural motions harmless error; trial court did not violate appellant's constitutional rights by denying request to appoint counsel in civil action.AbeleGallia 9/27/2017 10/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8244
State v. Sanders 16CA25Court costs were mandated by R.C. 2947.23(A)(1)(a) and new statutory language provided by R.C. 2947.23(C) was inapplicable; and appellant's claims were further barred by the doctrine of res judicata.AbelePickaway 9/27/2017 10/5/2017 2017-Ohio-8088
Burchett v. Burchett 16CA3784Appellant forfeited any arguable error, and actually invited any alleged error, that might be associated with the trial court's decision not to hold a hearing on the appellant's contempt motion. Appellant (1) did not object when the court converted the contempt hearing into a pre-trial conference; (2) participated in the pre-trial conference; (3) responded to the appellee's motion to dismiss, and (4) failed to object, and thus acquiesced, when the court set the matter for a non-oral hearing. Generally, Ohio courts have recognized that a trial court does not abuse its discretion by not conducting a hearing on a contempt motion when no hearing was requested.AbeleScioto 9/27/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8124
State v. White 16CA3747Evidence was sufficient to support convictions for constructive possession of and trafficking in heroin.AbeleScioto 9/25/2017 10/5/2017 2017-Ohio-8087
State v. Persons 16CA16CRIMINAL - Because Appellant failed to provide a transcript of the proceedings we presume the validity of the lower court's proceedings and affirm.McFarlandMeigs 9/22/2017 9/27/2017 2017-Ohio-7879
Cummin v. Cummin 16CA19 & 16CA20DOMESTIC RELATIONS - Because trial court abused its discretion by disregarding the prior mandate in the prior remand, case is reversed in part and again remanded for limited purpose of determining how much of Appellant's income is imputed, and other issues on appeal are not from a final appealable order and are dismissed in part.McFarlandHocking 9/21/2017 9/27/2017 2017-Ohio-7877
12345678910...>>