Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 111 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
World Business Servs., Inc. v. Yoest E-17-034The grant of summary judgment will be reversed where there remain genuine issues of material fact and, when viewing the record strongly in favor of appellant, appellees are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.SingerErie 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1541
State v. Tingler OT-17-024Trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to re-enter a prior journal entry in order to enable appellant to perfect an appeal.PietrykowskiOttawa 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1542
Rohlman v. Rohlman L-17-1204Trial court properly awarded appellee spousal support by construing the parties' consent entry against appellant, who was the drafter of the entry. Trial court's classification of attorney's fees and litigation expenses as spousal support was not an abuse of discretion where the classification was equitable in light of appellant's contemptuous conduct.JensenLucas 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1543
State v. Hampton E-17-008, E-17-009Appellant fails to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel where he does not point to any fact in the record showing that he was uninformed of our decision in State v. Gonzales, 6th Dist. Wood No. WD-13-086, 2015-Ohio-461, or that the amount of the actual cocaine involved was less than the statutory threshold.JensenErie 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1544
Moore v. Moore E-17-011Neglect of husband's trial counsel in failing to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, failing to file timely objections, and failing to present the evidence to his satisfaction did not provide grounds for new trial under Civ.R. 59(A) or to vacate judgment under Civ.R. 60(B).JensenErie 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1545
State v. Maurer S-17-049, S-17-050In a probation violation proceeding, the court was presumed to have personally addressed the defendant prior to her waiver of counsel to ensure the waiver was fully informed. Crim.R. 32.3; Crim.R. 44(C); regularity of the proceedings.PietrykowskiSandusky 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1546
State v. Lamb L-17-1165Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw granted.PietrykowskiLucas 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1547
In re Kail.K. L-17-1262, L-17-1263, L-17-1264Termination of parental rights. Trial court's grant of permanent custody of five children to agency not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Consideration of mother's marijuana use not improper.SingerLucas 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1548
State v. Gibbs E-16-082Motion to suppress properly denied upon consideration of the totality of the circumstances; trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance.PietrykowskiErie 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1549
Cousino v. Mercy St. Vincent Med. Ctr. L-17-1218Hospital established that all documents within credentialing file were generated by or exclusively for peer review committee and are therefore privileged under R.C. 2305.252. If there are documents outside of the credentialing file that are protected by the peer review and/or the attorney-client privilege, hospital must establish that the privilege(s) apply, as to each document, identify the document(s) on a privilege log, and submit the documents, under seal, to the trial court for in-camera inspection.MayleLucas 4/20/2018 4/20/2018 2018-Ohio-1550