Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 199 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
04/14/2021 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions—Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review.   4/14/2021 4/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1202
Disciplinary Counsel v. Dougherty (Slip Opinion) 2020-1514Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct—Knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal—Failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter—Failure to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation—Two-year suspension, with conditions.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-1240 4/14/2021 4/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1240
State ex rel. Whittaker v. Lucas Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion) 2020-1127Mandamus—R.C. 2935.09—Citizen affidavits—Appellant lacks clear legal right to prosecution of felonious-assault charges—Court of appeals’ grant of summary judgment in favor of prosecutor affirmed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-1241 4/14/2021 4/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1241
04/14/2021 Case Announcements #2  Affidavits of disqualification—Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals.   4/14/2021 4/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1273
04/13/2021 Case Announcements  Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions—Disciplinary cases.   4/13/2021 4/13/2021 2021-Ohio-1201
State ex rel. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. O'Donnell (Slip Opinion) 2020-0972Mandamus—Prohibition—Civ.R. 13(J)—Civil rule requires transfer of a case to the court of common pleas when a party’s counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim excess a municipal court’s jurisdictional limit—Municipal court did not have authority to transfer a case on ground that plaintiff’s claim exceeded the court’s jurisdictional limits—Common pleas court had no basis on which to assume jurisdiction over transfer of case from municipal court—Writs of mandamus and prohibition granted against common pleas court judge.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-1205 4/13/2021 4/13/2021 2021-Ohio-1205
State ex rel. Person v. McCarty (Slip Opinion) 2020-0894Mandamus—Relator had adequate remedy at law by way of direct appeal to challenge unanimity of jury verdict—Relator had adequate remedy at law by way of App.R. 26(B) application for reopening to raise claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel—Court of appeals’ judgment dismissing complaint affirmed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-1207 4/13/2021 4/13/2021 2021-Ohio-1207
04/13/2021 Case Announcements #2  Merit decisions with opinions—Affidavits of disqualification—Motion and procedural rulings.   4/13/2021 4/13/2021 2021-Ohio-1262
Disciplinary Counsel v. Armstrong 2021-0260Attorneys at law—Reciprocal discipline from the Supreme Court of Arizona—90 day suspension from the practice of law with reinstatement conditioned on reinstatement by the Supreme Court of Arizona—Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4).   4/12/2021 4/12/2021 2021-Ohio-1219
04/12/2021 Case Announcements  Disciplinary cases.   4/12/2021 4/12/2021 2021-Ohio-1220
12345678910...>>