| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2019-0900
|
State of Ohio
v.
Christopher Willingham
|
OPEN
|
8/21/2019
| Proposition of Law I: A court of appeals is divested of jurisdiction to sua sponte reconsider its own opinion, without notice, once an appeal is perfected to the Ohio Supreme Court |
|
2019-0900
|
State of Ohio
v.
Christopher Willingham
|
OPEN
|
8/21/2019
| Proposition of Law II: In a sexual assault case, a defendant does not establish actual prejudice, for purposes of a claim of pre-indictment delay analysis, through the loss of any evidence that might bolster a consent defense. At a minimum, there must be a reliable indication that such evidence existed and could have been obtained, is non-speculative, and that such evidence was material and substantially probative on the issue of consent |
|
2019-0898
|
City of Cincinnati
v.
Fourth National Realty, LLC
|
OPEN
|
9/3/2019
| Proposition of Law No. 1: Service on the Attorney General of a claim alleging an ordinance is unconstitutional must be made at the inception of the case pursuant to R.C. 2721.12 |
|
2019-0873
|
City of Centerville
v.
Michael P. Knab
|
OPEN
|
8/20/2019
| PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 1:
A municipality qualifies as a “victim” under the Ohio
Constitution’s Bill of Rights, at Article I, Section 10a, known as
Marsy’s Law, and is entitled to “full and timely restitution” when it
is “directly and proximately harmed” by the commission of a
criminal offense or act. |
|
2019-0850
|
Diana Davis, as Administrator of the Estate of Jason Barry, et al.
v.
Montez D. Hollins, et al.
|
OPEN
|
9/3/2019
| Proposition of Law No. I: A heightened duty of a premises owner to warn or protect business invitees from criminal activity on its premises is not inferred based solely upon the occurrence of a previous violent crime on those premises, particularly a crime different in form. |
|
2019-0850
|
Diana Davis, as Administrator of the Estate of Jason Barry, et al.
v.
Montez D. Hollins, et al.
|
OPEN
|
9/3/2019
| Proposition of Law No. II: Not all forms of violent criminal activity automatically become foreseeable. Otherwise, a business owner would become the insurer of a business invitee’s safety, an obligation the law does not impose. |
|
2019-0838
|
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
v.
The Ohio Valley Coal Company c/o CT Corporation System et al.
|
OPEN
|
9/3/2019
| Proposition of Law No. 1: Ohio law does not permit reimbursement for preventive measures as damages before any tort has occurred. |
|
2019-0838
|
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
v.
The Ohio Valley Coal Company c/o CT Corporation System et al.
|
OPEN
|
9/3/2019
| Proposition of Law No. 2: When a regulation provides a specific remedy for a violation of its terms, no plaintiff may recover damages not provided for in the regulation or enabling statute. |
|
2019-0838
|
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
v.
The Ohio Valley Coal Company c/o CT Corporation System et al.
|
OPEN
|
9/3/2019
| Proposition of Law No. 3: Ohio SMCRA does not abrogate the validity of surface damage waivers as to commercial structures. |
|
2019-0788
|
State of Ohio
v.
Gregory D. Anderson
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
8/21/2019
| Trial Court Erred to the prejudice of appellant in accepting a guilty plea, which was not made knowingly, in violation of appellant's due process rights. |
|