| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2017-0913
|
Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow, Jeremy Aker, et al.
v.
Ohio Department of Education
|
OPEN
|
9/13/2017
| PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. 4: ODE Is Barred, By The Plain And
Unambiguous Language Of R.C. 3314.08, From Imposing The Challenged
Durational Criterion
|
|
2017-0891
|
State of Ohio
v.
Andrew J. Kouts
|
OPEN
|
9/13/2017
| During a plea proceeding, does a trial court's failure to inform a defendant about the residential restrictions imposed on sex offenders under R.C. Chapter 2950 render the plea invalid? |
|
2017-0870
|
The Bank of New York Mellon
v.
Susan L. Rhiel, Trustee
|
OPEN
|
9/13/2017
| (1) Whether an individual who is not identified in the body of a mortgage, but who signs and initials the mortgage, is a mortgagor of his or her interest? |
|
2017-0870
|
The Bank of New York Mellon
v.
Susan L. Rhiel, Trustee
|
OPEN
|
9/13/2017
| (2) Is a mortgage signed and initialed by an individual whose name is not identified in the body of the mortgage but whose signature is properly acknowledged pursuant to Ohio Revised Code 5301, invalid as a matter of law such that parol evidence is not admissible to determine the intent of the individual signing the mortgage? |
|
2017-0696
|
Portage County Board of Developmental Disabilities
v.
Portage County Educators' Association for Developmental Disabilities
|
OPEN
|
7/26/2017
| "What standard of review governs appellate review of a decision by the court of common pleas confirming, modifying, vacating, or correcting an arbitration award?" |
|
2017-0693
|
Kristen Elliott-Thomas
v.
David Kane Smith et al.
|
OPEN
|
7/26/2017
| "Does the tort of intentional interference with or destruction of evidence include claims alleging interference with or concealment of evidence that disrupt a plaintiff's underlying case? Or, is the tort of intentional interference with or destruction of evidence limited to claims that allege evidence is physically altered or destroyed?" |
|
2017-0483
|
State of Ohio
v.
Gerry L. Moore, Sr. aka Gary L. Moore, Sr.
|
OPEN
|
6/21/2017
| Propositoin of Law No. One: O.R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(b) Does not Violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution or the Ohio Constitution. |
|
2017-0483
|
State of Ohio
v.
Gerry L. Moore, Sr. aka Gary L. Moore, Sr.
|
OPEN
|
6/21/2017
| Proposition of Law No. Two: An appellate Coyrt errs when it sua sponte determines that a statutory scheme violates the equal protection clause when the constitutionality of the statute was never challenged at the trial coutrt level now was it briefed by either party to the appeal. |
|
2017-0433
|
In re: R.K.
(A.S., Appellant)
|
OPEN
|
5/17/2017
| Proposition of Law: In a proceeding where the state is attempting to terminate the parental rights between a mother and her child, the mother has a right to counsel and she cannot be deprived of this right unless the court finds that the mother has knowingly waived her right to counsel. Wavier of counsel cannot be inferred from the unexplained failure f the mother to appear at the hearing.
|
|
2017-0244
|
State of Ohio
v.
Kenneth R. Johnson
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
4/19/2017
| Whether the post-release control notification of R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(e) must include notification of the penalty provisions in R.C. 2929.141(A)(1)-(2), specifically, whether a trial court must inform an offender at the time of sentencing that the commission of a felony during a period of post-release control permits a trial court to impose a new prison term for the violation to be served consecutively with any prison term for the new felony." |
|